As you know, the US District Court has, at least
temporarily, shot down the IRS tax preparer regulation regime.
Let me offer a starting point for a discussion on “voluntary”
tax preparer certification via an independent National Institute of Registered
Tax Return Preparers.
I use the designation of “Registered Tax Return
Preparer” only as a convenience and for comparison to the recently stuck down regulation
regime. The name could very well be “Certified
Tax Return Preparer” or something else.
All individuals who prepare 10 or more tax returns
for compensation would be required to register with the Internal Revenue
Service and receive a PTIN (Preparer Tax Identification Number). The only requirements for registration are
that the individual has not been convicted of a financial-related felony within
the past 10 years, and he/she is current with 1040 filings (but not payments). There will be no charge for the initial
registration, or at most a nominal $25 registration fee. So that this registry remains current,
PTIN-holders must renew their registration every 5 years. There will be no further requirements, or charge,
for renewal. This will be the extent of IRS
“regulation” of “unenrolled” preparers, other than as previously provided in
Circular 230 (prior to the initiation of the regulation regime).
PTIN-holders can voluntarily elect to apply with
the National Institute for Registered Tax Return Preparers for the designation
of Registered Tax Return Preparer (RTRP).
The Institute will be an independent non-profit organization
established solely for the purpose of issuing, maintaining, and promoting the
RTRP designation. Its governing board
will consist of a representative, perhaps the Executive Director or Board
President, of the National Association of Tax Professionals, the National
Society of Tax Professionals, the National Society of Accountants, the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the American Bar Association, and
any other appropriate tax-related membership organization, a high-ranking representative
of the Internal Revenue Service, and at least two “previously unenrolled” practicing
tax professionals.
In order to be designated as a RTRP, a candidate
must possess a valid PTIN and pass a competency test on federal 1040 tax law. A “grandfathering exemption” from this test
will be allowed for –
·
Tax professionals who have been consistently
preparing federal income tax returns on at least a half-time basis (during the
traditional tax filing season) for at least five (5) full years AND who have
successfully completed a total of 48 hours of continuing professional education
(CPE) in federal taxation in the 3-year period (36 months) prior to applying
for the designation.
·
Tax professionals who have been licensed or
certified to prepare income tax returns under a required state program that
includes a competency test.
·
Individuals who have successfully completed a
certificate or certification program in federal income taxation offered by a
qualified educational institution or qualified membership organization that includes
testing.
The "grandfathering" period for applicants shall last for the first three (3) years of the program.
RTRPs
must renew their designation every three (3) years by submitting proof of
completion of a total of 48 hours of CPE in federal taxation during the three-year
period, with at least 8 hours each year.
The 48 hours must include three (3) hours of “tax updates” per year (a
total of 9 hours) and one (1) hour of “ethics update” within the three-year
period.
There have been many attempts at voluntary
certification of tax return preparers – creating a designation for tax
preparers (Certified Tax Preparer, Chartered Tax Preparer, etc) – over the
years. But none have been successful
because they were offered and maintained by individual membership or CPE organizations and
were not universally accepted by the industry.
Creating a National Institute of RTRPs, with representatives of all
industry “players” to maintain the designation, should correct this.
What do you think?
RDF
So, how do we get this started. How do we get the "players" involved?
ReplyDeleteI am all for it. Where do I sign up?
I have found, after taking numerous licensing exams over the years, that those for which the exam was essential to be licensed, the exam typically asked irrelevant questions on irrelevant garbage (real estate salespersons and brokers exams, stockbroker exams--"which Act made insider trading illegal? 1933 Act or the 1934 Act?"--and life and disability exams). Those exams that were voluntary in the sense that you aren't required to pass the exam in order to do most of the things the license allows typically ask reasonable questions in areas that would actually be somewhat useful, including both the EA and CFP exams.
ReplyDeleteOkay Robert, here are my thoughts.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/01/voluntary-licensing.html
What is the point of the EA then?
ReplyDeleteGG-
ReplyDeleteThe Enrolled Agent can represent taxpayers before the IRS - they can "practice" before the IRS.
The voluntary RTRP, or whatever, would not be able to "practice" before the IRS, just as the IRS regulagted RTRP could not.
TWTP
So where do the people fit in who have already met the RTRP requirements? (paid for the PTIN, paid for and passed the test, paid for and received CPE's)
ReplyDeleteZ-
ReplyDeleteThe PTIN requirement has not been stopped. That remains. As for the RTRP designation, I expect if the decision stands it will be a useless designation and wasted money.
In my voluntary certification program, those who had passed the IRS competency test and been designated RTRP would be "grandfathered" into the system.
TWTP
I have spent several months studying to take RTRP exam so I could have a credential to use when I offer to prepare individual 1040's. I was to take the exam tomorrow but the testing has been closed down, and now I'm left hanging with tax season about to start. Since I am supervised by a CPA, I wasn't even required to become a RTRP, but I would have been able to show that I had some minimum competency.
ReplyDeleteBuy an EA study guide and build off what you already know.
DeleteI agree. Become an EA, instead. You've already built up some knowledge, so it shouldn't be a much bigger hurdle. And who knows? You may end up with a larger base of knowledge that will help you.
DeleteAm I the only one who kind of agrees with the IRS, here? I know that 99% of tax preparers are intelligent about taxes, do the best work they can on tax returns, and are basically honest. It's the other 1% that bothers the IRS. The dog groomer who does taxes on the side seems to be Nina Olsen's favorite. In the mid-90's, I once drove by a billboard in Atlanta for a car dealership that would do your tax return for free and let you use the anticipated refund as a down payment. The IRS just wants to be sure that these 'tax preparers' can understand the tax return they're charging money to prepare, and not just blindly typing numbers into tax software.
As a long-time preparer (43 years) and having worked for CPA firms and tax departments of law firms also holding both a BSBA and A MAFM in accounting I think the IRS requirement to regulate the tax preparation industry is needed. There should be a basic test and education requirement. Due to personal circumstances I do not have either a CPA or Ea license. The RTRP is a good start that should be regulated into an accounting/finance degree and the EA as the lowest level to prepare and sign returns.
Deletepersonally most preparers are over prepping for the RTRP. a few months is all you need to freshen up for the SEE so you could become an EA.
ReplyDelete